Monday, March 19, 2012


World Water Forum Breaks Down Dam Impacts

4 comments:

  1. Opinion/Reflection
    Like Dianna, I don't believe I've ever seen a dam in person, and I definitely never realized how harmful they could be to the environment! I don't think it ever occured to me that in order for a dam to be built, the natural environment surrounding it could possibly be destroyed. Even though they help provide alternate sources of energy, they create massive drains on the surrounding environment.
    "Do you believe more Dams should be built in the US? Why or why not?"
    I don't believe the US should build more dams unless absolutely, completely necessary. There are better sources of alternate energy that aren't as environmentally dangerous. Things like windmills, and solar panels could be used instead to provide alternate sources of energy. I don't believe that endangering many natural environments is worth building more dams.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Reflection:
    I think this is a really interesting topic. There are two clear sides of the story and good points to go along with each of them. If you do not build a dam, it could harm irragation. It could also cause bad floods. If you do build a dam, then there are bad enviromnental issues. If I were to choose a side I would choose to cuild a dam because I'd rather find other animals to eat then have my house flooded.

    Question one:
    I do not think the United States needs anymore dams. I have not heard about bad floodings recently, although I don't really watch the news. If there happens to be bad floodings going on then we should build a dam. There is no point putting the money into a huge dam unles it is necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Opinion/Reflection
    You would never think that something as beneficial as building a dam could actually be so harmful! Building a dam used to mean more resourceful energy, a better economy, and solutions to flooding. When these dams are abandoned, the impacts that they leave in their trails are awful. Also, I do not quite understand how the natives cannot get used to having a dam in their local community. Dams are supposed to be positive! I do agree with the fact that building dams takes animals’ habitats away from them, and that is not fair. When habitats are taken away from the animals, then the whole ecosystem changes. Humans never meant for THAT to happen.

    Do you believe the possible destruction of the environment is worth receiving cheaper energy?
    Of course not! There are plenty of ways to obtain energy, not just through hydro-power! The Earth has gifted us so many ways to receive its energy. There is nothing that we need to harm in order to receive it! If building dams does mess up ecosystems and startle its village members, then maybe we should just find another way!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Opinion/Reflection:
    I was really happy that Dianna chose to do this article. Most of us have known what a dam was for quite a while, but i can say i have personally only known the positive side of dams. It never occurred to me that dams could be negative (but i am starting to relize there is almost always a positive and a negative). Although we are not yet into the hydrosphere unit, this reminds me of what we are doing in class, but kind of the opposite. The controversy of human overpopulation, like damns, has negatives and positives. When i first hear the word dam i would normally get a positive reaction (although this might have changed after reading the article), but when I hear the words human overpopulation I get a negative feeling. I am starting to understand why it is so important to research and understand both the positive and negative viewpoints of a situation.

    other questions:
    Is there a "best" way to receive alternative energy?
    How many dams do we have in the US?
    Would you rather have dams (with all the risks) or no alternative energy at all?
    If dams were gotten rid of, will humans along with the environment will suffer?

    ReplyDelete